
Governor Board Pack
A test, a brief and a termly cadence for boards governing a technology estate
Three parts for one board year: the twelve-statement Governor Oversight Test, a supporting brief on spend, evidence and sovereignty, and a termly cadence. Around 40 minutes of board time, plus the test taken individually beforehand.
One · The test
Twelve statements on visibility, challenge, provenance and continuity. Each governor answers alone before the meeting, then the board compares. Where two governors disagree, the lower score is the more useful one.
| No | In part | Yes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Governors see spend, usage and outcomes for their own school, not a curated summary. | |||
| 2The board can see which suppliers hold pupil data and on what terms. | |||
| 3A governor can ask an unscheduled question and get an answer without staff assembling it by hand. | |||
| 4Papers state their sources, so a figure can be traced to where it came from. | |||
| 5The board has declined or reversed a management proposal in the last two years. | |||
| 6At least one governor can read a data protection or licensing term and say what it means. | |||
| 7Model-generated content in board papers is labelled as such. | |||
| 8The board knows what would stop working if the primary supplier failed. | |||
| 9Contract renewal dates are visible to the board in advance, not reported after signature. | |||
| 10Succession is planned for the people who currently hold the institution's technical knowledge. | |||
| 11The board has agreed what it will not delegate, in writing. | |||
| 12New governors are inducted into the technology estate, not only into finance and safeguarding. |
- Visibility
- Statements 1, 2, 3. Out of 6.
- Challenge
- Statements 4, 5, 6. Out of 6.
- Provenance
- Statements 7, 8, 9. Out of 6.
- Continuity
- Statements 10, 11, 12. Out of 6.
Two · The supporting brief
- What boards can see
- In field research with trusts responsible for around 50,000 students, no board could state total technology spend across its schools to the nearest ten thousand pounds without asking the office first.
- Where exposure accumulates
- Contracts renew on a date the board rarely holds. By the time evidence of value arrives, leverage has passed. Renewal dates belong on the board calendar alongside audit and budget.
- What counts as evidence
- Task completion and staff enthusiasm are the weakest available proxies for learning. Ask for a baseline recorded before adoption, and for effect reported alongside cost, including staff hours.
- Where the human decision stays
- Model output entering a pupil record needs a named person who reviewed it. Write down which judgements the board will never delegate, and who holds them.
- What sovereignty means here
- Data residency is a location. Sovereignty is control: who holds the audit log, who chooses the model provider, and whether the institution could leave with its records intact.
| Answered | Not yet | |
|---|---|---|
| 1What do we spend on technology across all our schools this year, to the nearest £10,000? | ||
| 2Which tools are actually used, by how many staff, how often? | ||
| 3What changed for pupils, measured against a baseline that existed before we bought it? | ||
| 4Which contracts renew before our next meeting? | ||
| 5Where does pupil data go when a tool calls an external model, and who holds the log? |
Three · The cadence
- Autumn · first meeting
- Run the test as a board and compare scores. Agree the improvement missions technology is expected to serve. Put every renewal date in the next twelve months on the board calendar.
- Spring · mid-year
- Time how long a traceable answer to one unscheduled question takes to arrive. Review spend against usage for the three largest subscriptions. Record what the board will not delegate.
- Summer · before renewal season
- Run the tenancy test on the supplier you depend on most. Retake the test with the same people. Publish what the year taught you, including null results.
Take the Governor Oversight Test online to see your score against the anonymised sector benchmark at educave.ai. educave.ai · Free to copy, forward and use inside your institution, with attribution.