Educave research
Field notes · June 2026

What trust leaders cannot see

Field notes from trust leaders responsible for around 50,000 students.

Educave Research · 8 min
~50,000
students in the trusts represented
0
could evidence edtech impact centrally
1 term
typical lag before drift is visible
12+
disconnected data sources in a single trust

The finding

Every leader we spoke to described the same gap, in different vocabulary. None could say which of the tools their schools pay for actually work. Subscriptions renew by default. Usage is not tracked. Impact is not reported quarterly, termly, or at all.

This is not a procurement failure. It is a capture failure. The data that would answer the question exists, spread across a management information system, a finance package, a provision map and a dozen supplier portals that do not speak to each other.

Contribute evidence

If your school, trust or product has evidence that tests this piece, send it in. Submissions are anonymised before anything is published.

Contribute evidence
Method and anonymisation

Structured discovery calls with executive and national-director level leaders in English multi-academy trusts, collectively responsible for around 50,000 students. Recorded with consent, coded from transcripts, and reported here in anonymised paraphrase. No trust, school or individual is identified.

Download PDF · Back to research · Chat with a researcher